Archive for May 4th, 2010

GULF COAST OIL SPILL – HOW SALONS CAN HELP

Anyone and Everyone: salons, groomers, individuals can sign up to donate hair and fur clippins and nylons for our Oil Spill Booms. Our Excess Access program sign up is free, fast and helps us to coordinate the masses of donations.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP TO DONATE HAIR / FUR / NYLONS

Thousands of pounds of hair and nylons are coming in by UPS and FED EX from every State in the US and from Canada, Brazil, France, UK… Booms are being made all along the Gulf Coast near beaches and marshes. What a community feeling! We all get it. We shampoo because hair collects oil! More Info

OIL SPILL HAIRBOOMS AND HAIRMATS
Here we look at fibers (hair, wool, fur, feathers…). Thousands of salons mail us hair clippings, swept up off their floors, and the fibers are stuffed into booms or woven into hair mats. We all know about shampooing our oily hair, but it took Phill McCrory, a stylist from Alabama, to realize that hair was also an efficient and abundant material for collecting and containing petroleum spills.

For how you can get involved please visit Matter of Trust

Check out this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg9vdnOuEhk

Antibacterial Soaps:No health benefits, and risky to boot

Antibacterial soaps have no health benefits over plain soaps, according to a new study by University of Michigan public health professor Allison Aiello, Ph.D. Consumer Antibacterial Soaps: Effective or Just Risky is the first comprehensive study to test whether antibacterial soaps sold for home use are more effective than plain soaps in removing bacteria and preventing infectious disease.

The short answer is – NO and NO.

Dr. Aiello and her team found that washing hands with a consumer antibacterial soap was no more effective in preventing infectious illness than plain soap. They also found that antibacterial soaps at formulations sold to the public do not remove any more bacteria from the hands than plain soaps.

“ The soaps containing triclosan used in the community setting are no more effective than plain soap at preventing infectious illness symptoms, as well as reducing bacteria on the hands,” Aiello’s report states.

It’s bad enough that consumer anti-bacterial soaps don’t do what they claim to protect health. These soaps also have health risks. Aiello reports that because of the way triclosan, the main active ingredient in many antibacterial soaps, reacts in the cells, it may cause some bacteria to become resistant to commonly used drugs such as amoxicillin.

The rise of antibiotic resistant bacteria is responsible for an increasing number of hospitalizations, deaths, and school closures. Public health advocates are concerned over the overuse of antimicrobial products and antibiotics.

Triclosan is found in hundreds of common everyday products, including nearly half of all commercial soaps, especially liquid soaps. Triclosan is also an ingredient in deodorants, toothpastes, cosmetics, fabrics and plastics. Microban and Irgasan are other names for triclosan.

The study, “Consumer Antibacterial Soaps: Effective or Just Risky?” appears in the August 2007 edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration led a panel of experts and industry representatives to weigh and analyze different germ-killing methods. The panel found “no firm scientific evidence that the flood of antimicrobial products we observe has any discernible benefit over the use of regular soap and water.”

Anti-bacterial soaps used in hospitals and other clinical settings contain higher concentrations of triclosan that those in consumer products, and may be more effective at reducing illness and bacteria in the hospital setting, according to the researchers.

Thanks to Beyond Pesticides